Everyone is talking about ranking on Google.
Fewer people are asking:
"How often does ChatGPT recommend my brand?"
I tested @pallasai_io and realized AI search has created an entirely new visibility problem.
You enter your website.
The platform then:
✓ Maps your competitors
✓ Breaks down audience intent
✓ Tracks brand mentions across ChatGPT, Claude & Perplexity
✓ Shows how AI actually describes your company
✓ Compares your visibility against competitors
✓ Generates content designed to increase AI citations
✅ Safe Reply
This is the right framing. The blue-links world had established playbooks.
One question: did you find the gap between 'what you think AI says about you' and 'what it actually says' was bigger than expected?
The interesting pattern is that most brands are still playing SEO while their potential customers are already asking AI for recommendations.
Different game entirely. And the metrics don't transfer.
Signups dropped this week compared to previous. My agent found why, and the fix went live tonight.
Day 14 of 100, taking LinkedMash to $2,000 MRR with AI agents. Current: $201.50.
Traffic held steady all week. But new-visitor conversion fell 14.1% to 4.8%, dated exactly to last week's homepage change. The page sold features, not the transformation.
✅ Safe Reply
Traffic held but conversion dropped. That's a quality-of-traffic signal, not a volume problem.
Did the homepage change affect which channels send you visitors, or just how they behave once they land?
Conversion drop but traffic steady usually means you're still getting found by the right people - they just didn't recognise themselves in the old message.
Curious: did the 14.1% show up across all sources, or is it concentrated somewhere specific?
Whenever a brand comes to me and tells me that their organic traffic tanked...
I ask them one, simple question:
"Are you publishing AI content?"
95% of the time, they tell me they are.
And so I tell them:
"That's your problem."
I know there are a lot of people who think you can "automate" SEO content with Claude...
But trust me, it doesn't work long-term.
Traffic increases initially, but it always collapses a few months later.
Google has gotten really good at detecting AI content recently.
✅ Safe Reply
Google SEO and AI visibility are different games - one is about links and keywords, the other is about whether your brand gets cited as an authoritative source.
Are you seeing brands optimise for Google but ignore AI platforms entirely?
The conflation I see constantly: Google penalising low-quality AI content, and AI platforms recommending authoritative sources.
Those are opposite signals. The brands getting penalised on Google aren't necessarily the ones AI ignores - but most people treat them as the same problem.
Well today on my journey to landing my first paying user, I went deep into Reddit to find people who are already paying for tools but frustrated with them.
The #1 pattern I keep seeing:
"Ahrefs is way too expensive for what I need" or "Ahrefs gives me way more SEO data than I actually want, I just want to explore keywords & competitors easily."
So I took those exact pain phrases and updated my hero headline + description to match how they actually talk.
✅ Safe Reply
Taking actual Reddit complaints and updating copy with their exact language is solid research.
One thing worth checking: do those same people mention specific frustrations with the alternatives they've tried, or just price?
The best positioning insight is usually buried in what people say when they think nobody's selling to them.
Were you reading threads where they were actively complaining, or threads asking for help?
Founders asking:
"How do I get my first customers without spending on ads?"
Most people immediately think: SEO. Cold outreach. Paid acquisition.
We did something much simpler.
We looked for places where frustrated users were already talking about existing tools.
People comparing options. Complaining. Asking for alternatives.
Then we showed up with a real answer.
No growth hacks. No ad spend.
✅ Safe Reply
This works until the conversation is already saturated with answers.
Did you develop a sense for when you're early to a community thread vs when it's already too late?
The hard part is recognizing the moments that actually matter, and knowing how to engage without sounding like a pitch.
This is the real skill. Any signal on what tipped the balance between helpful and salesy?